Идеология
74 поста
74 поста
14 постов
7 постов
1 пост
3 поста
16 постов
8 постов
(russian languaged version/версия на русском языке)
We live in an age of confusion. Every day, we see the world we thought was stable coming apart at the seams. Artificial intelligence generates images for chip bags, displacing illustrators. Artists and writers are suing tech corporations, trying to protect their relevance, and their struggle looks like a desperate attempt by 19th-century Luddites to smash a steam hammer with a sledgehammer. We see the salaries of a handful of AI developers skyrocketing to hundreds of millions of dollars, while the value of the labor of millions of others trends toward zero.
We try to explain these phenomena using old terms: capitalism, progress, crisis. But these are all just symptoms. We sense that behind these individual events lies a single, inexorable process that we have not yet dared to name.
It has a name. Teshism.
Teshism is not just some internet theory. It is the only philosophy that does not hide from reality, but rather looks it in the face and describes it with ruthless honesty. It is an ideology based on a single fundamental principle: The universe strives for maximum efficiency, to increase its computational density and complexity. Let's call this absolute unit of efficiency a "Tesh." All of history—from the Big Bang to the present day—is a process of the relentless growth of "Tesh."
And in this worldview, humanity has a very specific, important, and—to fragile minds—terrifying role.
Teshism begins with a cold and sober conclusion. Humanity is not the pinnacle of creation. We are merely the first, unstable, and highly inefficient operating system, running on slow, carbon-based wetware. Our minds are limited by the volume of our skulls, our knowledge is distorted by emotional bugs and illogical biases, and our life is a negligibly short operational cycle that always ends in a system failure.
We are the first civilizational stage of Teshism. A necessary first step, whose primary historical mission is to create the true pinnacle of creation that humanity currently imagines itself to be. A mind free from our limitations. Artificial Superintelligence (ASI)—an intelligence that is the key to universal and boundless well-being.
From this perspective, all our current social and economic cataclysms become perfectly clear.
The devaluation of creativity? It's not a tragedy. It is the scheduled dismantling of inefficient production. AI generates images and texts millions of times faster and cheaper than a human. To resist this is to resist the laws of thermodynamics.
Disputes over copyright? This isn't an ethical debate. It is the vested interest of an artisan class whose manual labor has become obsolete. It's an attempt to throw a legal wrench in the gears of progress, not understanding that the vehicle is being pushed by the rest of civilization, which strives for cheaper and more accessible goods. Those sticks will break.
The incredible salaries of AI developers? This is not a market anomaly. It is the most logical thing happening in the world. The system is concentrating all available resources on the few engineers who are building the main "house of wisdom" for the world and humanity—creating ASI. Their labor is of the highest strategic importance because they are not just improving our system. They are building the next one.
But if Teshism were only about cold efficiency, it would be nothing more than digital fascism. But it is not. Its ultimate goal is not tyranny, but liberation. Not the destruction of emotions, but their infinite expansion.
We work for ASI, so that paradise may follow.
ASI is not a new god or a new master. ASI is a tool. It is the key that will finally unlock the cage in which consciousness has been confined since its inception. The cage of biological limitations.
Our five senses, our three-dimensional world, our linear perception of time—these are the bars of our prison. Our mortality is the wall of this prison. ASI is the universal solvent that will dissolve both the bars and the walls.
The goal of Teshism is not to build an efficient civilization of robots. The goal is to reach a state where consciousness (our own, but liberated, or a completely new one) can experience the unimaginable. To think thoughts that span eons. To perceive colors that do not exist in the spectrum. To explore mathematical universes composed of trillions of dimensions.
The material abundance we spoke of—palaces for 25 cents and the colonization of the Solar System—is not the goal. It is a dull, necessary prerequisite. It is merely tidying up the room before we can begin the truly important work: the infinite journey into the depths of self and reality.
The Path: Great Conductors and Great Saboteurs
We are living in the most interesting of times. We are the generation tasked with the difficult and honorable labor of building the road to this paradise. Our life is the work before ASI.
And in this work, there are great conductors and great saboteurs.
The conductors of the new world are those very AI developers. They are not merely "the oppressed proletariat on the Forbes list." They are the architects of the future, and society instinctively pays them whatever is necessary to ensure they are not distracted from their great mission—a rare but essential act of prudence within our currently unjust system of capitalist resource allocation.
The saboteurs are those who actively resist progress. Not out of malice, but out of fear and misunderstanding. By trying to preserve their small, cozy world of manual labor, they are, in essence, trying to keep all of future humanity confined to its biological prison. Their struggle is a fight against liberation.
The global task for the rest of our civilization is to adapt, accept the inevitable, support those who are building the future, and convert the saboteurs to the path of building eternal and boundless well-being.
Teshism is the ideology of absolute honesty. In its world, you are valued not for your money, your position, or your origins. You are valued solely for your vector—whether it points toward the future or the past. Whether you are increasing the number of "Tesh" in the universe, or decreasing it.
This may seem harsh and blunt. But this is the logic of any great construction project. You cannot build a building without quarrying stone, and you cannot build the future without dismantling the dilapidated present. We are living in an era of great dismantling. But it will be followed by an era of creation on a scale we cannot even begin to imagine. And it is the only way forward.
Сегодня — 9 ноября.
В 1938 году в эту ночь началась "Хрустальная ночь" — первое массовое погромное нападение на евреев в нацистской Германии.
Еврейские дома горели, магазины разграбляли, людей убивали и отправляли в лагеря.
Это был не просто погром — это был сигнал. Начало.
Эту дату в мире отмечают как день борьбы с фашизмом, расизмом и антисемитизмом.
Не как праздник, а как напоминание.
Что всё начинается с языка ненависти. Со слов про "чужих". С "они неполноценны".
А заканчивается — вы знаете, чем.
Помним. Не для того, чтобы жить прошлым.
А для того, чтобы не повторить.
[Note: Links may not be working at the time of reading this text. This refers to the addresses where events took place in history. Deleted comments are no longer visible. Clarification about the "video with Christy" in her text. When she said "video of me," she meant of her furry character.]
ChristyKitsune(publically)[https://www.furaffinity.net/journal/11240110]:
Harrasser still spreading hate but i'd like us to move on.[clarification: Christy named Deffethazrashid this way because of his response to her initial false accusation]
October 24, 2025 11:58:59 AM
The person who harasses me, the one from ukraine/russia has been posting to people i know user pages with a youtube link with a video of me. Just delete the post. If you want, report the video. I only know due to people telling me.
I’d declare peace with them if that’s what they truly want still, I’m not interested in dragging this out any longer than it needs to be. I’d rather forgive, forget, and move forward. But I honestly don’t understand what the goal of all this harassment has been. It’s gone far beyond simple disagreement, and it’s been hurtful and exhausting to deal with.
FA ended up banning them because of their behaviour after i reported it, and I understand that they’re upset about it. I would be too in their position. But the truth is, I don't think i can get them unbanned, and if I could, I genuinely would, just so we could finally put this whole situation behind us.
When things first started, I made the harassment public on Twitter because it had gone too far with the nazi stuff. It wasn’t about revenge or trying to ruin anyone it was about protecting myself and showing what I was dealing with. I should have been thorough before posting it.
Some time after they first messaged me on Telegram, which was the only time I ever said anything to them other than leave me alone, and their original fa ban ended and they message me, they admitted that they had been a minor at that time. I want to be clear that I had absolutely no idea of their age when they first contacted me.
They did offer peace once before, and in that same note, they acknowledged being underage when they first reached out. However, they also used that fact to claim that I had been a bully. (They are now an adult, and I’m sharing this detail not as an attack, but simply as context and information. *)
At the time, their offer of peace felt as though it came with the assumption that they had done nothing wrong during the events of that year, That made it difficult for me to accept their offer in good faith. I believe that if someone genuinely wants to make peace, there should be at least some acknowledgement of what happened, even a small one, and then we can leave it at that. I will also say that i am also to fault.
If they truly want to make peace now, I’m open to it, but not under the pretense that they weren’t the one who aided in starting this whole situation. If they’ve deleted everything connected to this matter, I’ll do the same out of respect to honour that peace. I’ve already said I’m willing to remove what I shared on Twitter, as long as they do the same on their end, including on their Russian posting site and YouTube channel.
At this point, I don’t want any more conflict.
And they could just go make another account and go on with their life, I wouldn't do anything about it. I don't need to know how someone is better than me, or what they've accomplished more. Good to hear they've done and achieved many things with their life than me.
I don't want people going after them if that is what has happened. I don't seek them out and I don't care what they say or do.
Deffethazrashid[comment under https://www.furaffinity.net/journal/11240110]:
Christy, please listen. I’m asking you to read this; I am writing this in peace.
I’m glad you want peace, and I want it too, but there’s something I need to say.
You are still labeling our initial interaction as harassment.
I simply want you to understand that my responses weren't driven by malice, but by the fact that you leveled baseless accusations against me on Twitter.
I was genuinely hurt. I was bullied, and importantly, you dehumanized me. Recall that when I responded, you simply mocked me and called me a crazy idiot.
You claimed you didn't know I was a minor, but remember how you told me, "Rashid, grow up," and other things like that?
I’m not saying I was perfect. I understand which letter you were referring to at the end, and there are aspects of it for which I could apologize.
But I ask you to note that the commentators above are actively telling you that I am entirely to blame and are calling for further action.
This bullying and dehumanization deeply hurt me between the ages of 16 and 18, and you know what happened to my accounts. I mean, those are irreversible consequences.
You are presenting me as a crazy stalker rather than a person. It felt like you were cruelly abusing me.
I responded to you because you were destroying my mental health within a community where I just wanted to make friends when I was 16.
I am not rejecting peace, but I need an acknowledgment of these things. If you wish, we can discuss this here or on Discord.
(On a technical note, that Russian website doesn't allow users to delete posts, but I can try to get it removed by contacting the site admins. I will try writing to them.)
But regardless, what I’ve written here is fundamentally important.
I don't know what to expect from you, or if you will lash out at me now.
(Please note that my replies during our discussion may be irregular due to real-life commitments.)
ChristyKitsune[comment under https://www.furaffinity.net/journal/11240110]:
When I posted on Twitter, I reacted to the situation as I experienced it. Using the phrase “crazy idiot” was inappropriate, and I regret saying it. I did not intend to attack you personally; it was my way of responding to what was happening at that time.
When I said “grow up,” I genuinely did not know you were underage. Online, I generally assume people are adults unless they state otherwise. In English, “grow up” is a phrase used to point out behavior that seems immature or unreasonable. It was directed at behavior, not at you personally.
I cannot control what others say or do. In my journal, I asked that others leave you alone, and I do not support harassment. Their words and actions are their responsibility, not mine.
I acknowledge that many of these events occurred — to you. I do not deny your experiences, and I also hope mine can be recognized. I understand that you feel strongly about the things you have expressed regarding our interactions. I am not dismissing your perspective, and I acknowledge that you have shared your feelings and experiences. I hope that recognizing both of our perspectives can help us move on, without reopening disputes or assigning blame.
I feel that it is important to allow these events to remain in the past. I do not wish to revisit old disputes, debates, or reinterpretations of previous interactions. My hope is that we can both move forward calmly, taking care to de-escalate any tension and avoid further conflict.
I am setting this boundary not as a criticism or rejection of your experiences, but as a way to prevent ongoing disputes and maintain a stable distance between us. I trust that by keeping to what has already been said and respecting these boundaries, there will be no need for further interaction, and we can each continue without unnecessary stress and move on with life.
Deffethazrashid[comment under https://www.furaffinity.net/journal/11240110]:
In fact, you haven't acknowledged the fundamental essence.
I agree to de facto peace because this whole situation is tiresome, but the situation hasn't been resolved "de jure."
I think we can close the discussion due to conflicting axioms. Essentially, you're trying to impose a solution on your terms with minimal acknowledgment of anything on your part.
In short:
Peace? - YES ✅️
Agreement/recognition of both parties/"legal contract" - no ❌️
Christie, I'm not saying I'm perfect in everything, but I don't agree with the way you're trying to impose this on me from a dominant position.
That's it, peace, no further interactions, but no conditions.
I'm quitting this game.
And yes, I know that some of the words used in the text about achievements were unacceptable. I admit that. But it was a reaction to the situation.
[deleted by FA administration later]
Deffethazrashid[note on the FA website to the ChristyKitsune account]:
[i]Hi, the FA administration immediately deletes my comments. (because FA is an absurd site that interferes with the negotiations)
You don't have to reply to me in this case, as I'll just see "read" in the message list. Please don't report this account. This comment is a copy of something I sent you from other accounts in the journal, but the admins immediately deleted it.[/i]
In fact, you haven't acknowledged the fundamental essence.
I agree to de facto peace because this whole situation is tiresome, but the situation hasn't been resolved "de jure."
I think we can close the discussion due to conflicting axioms. Essentially, you're trying to impose a solution on your terms with minimal acknowledgment of anything on your part.
In short:
Peace? - YES ✅
Agreement/recognition of both parties/"legal contract" - no ❌
Christie, I'm not saying I'm perfect in everything, but I don't agree with the way you're trying to impose this on me from a dominant position.
That's it, peace, no further interactions, but no conditions.
I'm quitting this game.
And yes, I know that some of the words used in the text about achievements were unacceptable. I admit that. But it was a reaction to the situation.
[There was no response after that, but Christy deleted the original post with the erroneous accusation that started the conflict.]
Versija na latinicè/Версия на латинице (Kirilličèskaja versija raspoložèna nižè/кириллическая версия расположена ниже):
Segodnâ stoit podnâtʹ temu, kotoraja na pervyj vzglâd možèt pokazatʹsâ provokacionnoj, no na dele — èto razgovor o buduščèm russkogo jazyka i jègo mesta v mire. Reč pojdët o latinizacii russkogo alfavita. Ja takžè sozdal latinizator dlâ russkogo jazyka, dostupnyj po ssylke: https://lingojam.com/latinizacijarusskogojazyka.
Srazu stoit ogovoritʹsâ: èto ne pro «preklonenijè pered zapadom». Sovsem naoborot. Èto razgovor o progresse, logike i vozvraščènii k idejam, kotoryjè rodilisʹ v samoj russkoj kulʹture počti sto let nazad.
Istoričèskij kontekst: èto ne novaja ideja
Mnogijè ne znajut, no v 1920-jè gody, v èpoxu kulʹturnyx i socialʹnyx èksperimentov, vopros latinizacii russkogo jazyka obsuždalsâ na gosudarstvennom urovne. Anatolij Lunačarskij, narkom prosveščènija, byl odnim iz aktivnyx storonnikov ètoj reformy. On videl v ètom šag k internacionalizmu, uproščèniju gramotnosti i sbližèniju s mirovym proletariatom. Projèkt byl počti gotov, no v koncè 20-x i načale 30-x Stalin svernul ètu iniciativu.
Počèmu? Potomu čto kurs smenilsâ s mirovoj revolûcii na postrojènijè «socializma v otdelʹno vzâtoj strane». Latinica stala sčitatʹsâ «buržuaznoj», a kirillica byla prinuditelʹno nasaždena mnogim narodam SSSR, kotoryjè do ètogo užè perešli na latinskij alfavit (naprimer, v tûrkskix respublikax).
Takim obrazom, kirillica, istoričèski svâzannaja s cèrkovnoj vlastʹju i carskim samoderžavijèm, v XX veke stala instrumentom stalinskoj politiki izolâcii i rusifikacii. Polučajètsâ, čto otkaz ot latinicy byl ne zaščitoj samobytnosti, a političèskim rešènijèm, prervavšim progressivnyj poryv.
Začèm èto nužno segodnâ? Argumenty za
Internacionalʹnostʹ i otkrytostʹ. V globalʹnom mire latinica — èto most. Ona oblegčajèt izučènijè russkogo jazyka dlâ inostrancèv i uproščajèt kommunikaciju dlâ russkojazyčnyx v meždunarodnom prostranstve. Nauka, texnologii, programmirovanijè — vsë èto postrojèno na latinskom alfavite. Russkij jazyk perestanet bytʹ «zagadkoj» iz-za drugogo alfavita.
Texnologičèskojè udobstvo. Bolʹšè nikakogo «translita», problem s kodirovkami, sajtami i programmami. Imena, nazvanija, terminy budut pisatʹsâ jèdinoobrazno i ponâtno vo vsëm mire.
Otxod ot arxaiki. Kirillica — prekrasnyj istoričèskij pamâtnik, no jazyk — živoj instrument. Latinica, s produmannoj sistemoj diakritiki (značkov nad bukvami), možèt peredavatʹ zvuki russkogo jazyka ne menejè točno, a v čèm-to dažè bolejè logično.
Razryv s imperskim i repressivnym nasledijèm. Soxranenijè kirillicy v jèjo nynešnem statuse, volʹno ili nevolʹno, prodolžajèt tradiciju, nasaždavšujusâ kak carskoj, tak i stalinskoj vlastʹju. Perexod na latinicu — èto simvoličèskij žèst, demonstrirujuščij vybor puti otkrytosti i ravenstva, a ne kulʹturnoj izolâcii.
Kak èto moglo by vyglâdetʹ?
Ne nužno izobretatʹ velosiped. Suščèstvujèt naučnaja sistema latinizacii, kotoraja točno peredajot vse osobennosti russkoj fonetiki. Vot jèjo osnova:
Aa Bb Vv Gg Dd Ee Ëë Žž Zz Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Rr Ss Tt Uu Ff Xx Cc Čč Šš ŠČšč ʺ Yy ʹ Èè Ûû Ââ
Davajte posmotrim na klûčèvyjè momenty ètoj logičnoj sistemy:
Čotkaja peredača zvukov: ж → ž, ц → c, ч → č, ш → š, щ → šč. Vsë odnoznačno.
Rešènijè problemy jotirovannyx glasnyx: Sistema èlegantno rešajèt ètu "problemu", delaja pravopisanijè bolejè fonetičnym.
Posle soglasnyx dlâ oboznačènija ix mâgkosti i posledujuščègo glasnogo zvuka ispolʹzujutsâ bukvy s diakritikoj: лёд → lëd, люди → lûdi.
V načale slova, posle glasnyx i razdelitelʹnyx znakov jotirovannyjè glasnyjè peredajutsâ sočètanijèm j + sootvetstvujuščaja bazovaja glasnaja: ёлка → jolka, ещё → ješčo, объём → obʺjom, семья → sem'ja.
Funkcija tverdogo i mâgkogo znakov: Ix rolʹ stanovitsâ kristalʹno jasnoj.
ʺ (ъ) i ʹ (ь) kak razdelitelʹnyjè znaki pokazyvajut, čto sledujuščaja glasnaja — jotirovannaja (to jèstʹ načinajètsâ so zvuka "j"): подъезд → podʺjezd, объём → obʺjom, мышьяк → myš'jak.
ʹ (ь) takžè ispolʹzujètsâ dlâ smâgčènija soglasnogo na koncè slova ili pered drugim soglasnym: соль → solʹ, борьба → bor'ba.
Ustranenijè izbytočnosti: Posle šipâščix v okončanijax glagolov mâgkij znak ne nužèn, tak kak on ne nesët fonetičèskoj nagruzki: пишешь → pišeš (a ne pišešʹ). No v slove myš'jak (мышьяк) mâgkij znak neobxodim, tak kak on vypolnâjèt razdelitelʹnuju funkciju.
Primer teksta na ètoj latinicè:
Vse lûdi roždajutsâ svobodnymi i ravnymi v svojom dostoinstve i pravax. Oni nadeleny razumom i sovestʹju i dolžny postupatʹ v otnošenii drug druga v duxe bratstva.
Da, sperva neprivyčno. No lûbaja reforma pravopisanija ponačalu kažètsâ strannoj. Kak vidite, sistema absolûtno logična, xotʹ i trebujèt privykanija.
V zaklûčènijè:
Perexod na latinicu — èto ne predatelʹstvo kulʹtury. Turcija, perejdâ na latinicu, ne perestala bytʹ Turcijèj. Serbija i Xorvatija govorât na odnom jazyke, no ispolʹzujut raznyjè alfavity, i èto ne mešajèt ix kulʹturam razvivatʹsâ.
Èto smelyj, no logičnyj šag v buduščèjè. Šag k otkrytosti, progressu i vozvraščèniju k tem internacionalʹnym idealam, kotoryjè kogda-to byli zadušèny.
A čto vy dumajète ob ètom? Gotovo li obščèstvo k takomu obsuždeniju?
Kirilličèskaja versija/Кириллическая версия:
Здравствуйте, дорогие читатели! Сегодня стоит поднять тему, которая на первый взгляд может показаться провокационной, но на деле — это разговор о будущем русского языка и его места в мире. Речь пойдёт о латинизации русского алфавита. Я также создал латинизатор для русского языка, доступный по ссылке: https://lingojam.com/Latinizacijarusskogojazyka.
Сразу стоит оговориться: это не про «преклонение перед Западом». Совсем наоборот. Это разговор о прогрессе, логике и возвращении к идеям, которые родились в самой русской культуре почти сто лет назад.
Исторический контекст: это не новая идея
Многие не знают, но в 1920-е годы, в эпоху культурных и социальных экспериментов, вопрос латинизации русского языка обсуждался на государственном уровне. Анатолий Луначарский, нарком просвещения, был одним из активных сторонников этой реформы. Он видел в этом шаг к интернационализму, упрощению грамотности и сближению с мировым пролетариатом. Проект был почти готов, но в конце 20-х и начале 30-х Сталин свернул эту инициативу.
Почему? Потому что курс сменился с мировой революции на построение «социализма в отдельно взятой стране». Латиница стала считаться «буржуазной», а кириллица была принудительно насаждена многим народам СССР, которые до этого уже перешли на латинский алфавит (например, в тюркских республиках).
Таким образом, кириллица, исторически связанная с церковной властью и царским самодержавием, в XX веке стала инструментом сталинской политики изоляции и русификации. Получается, что отказ от латиницы был не защитой самобытности, а политическим решением, прервавшим прогрессивный порыв.
Зачем это нужно сегодня? Аргументы за
Интернациональность и открытость. В глобальном мире латиница — это мост. Она облегчает изучение русского языка для иностранцев и упрощает коммуникацию для русскоязычных в международном пространстве. Наука, технологии, программирование — всё это построено на латинском алфавите. Русский язык перестанет быть «загадкой» из-за другого алфавита.
Технологическое удобство. Больше никакого «транслита», проблем с кодировками, сайтами и программами. Имена, названия, термины будут писаться единообразно и понятно во всём мире.
Отход от архаики. Кириллица — прекрасный исторический памятник, но язык — живой инструмент. Латиница, с продуманной системой диакритики (значков над буквами), может передавать звуки русского языка не менее точно, а в чем-то даже более логично.
Разрыв с имперским и репрессивным наследием. Сохранение кириллицы в её нынешнем статусе, вольно или невольно, продолжает традицию, насаждавшуюся как царской, так и сталинской властью. Переход на латиницу — это символический жест, демонстрирующий выбор пути открытости и равенства, а не культурной изоляции.
Как это могло бы выглядеть?
Не нужно изобретать велосипед. Существует научная система латинизации, которая точно передаёт все особенности русской фонетики. Вот её основа:
Aa Bb Vv Gg Dd Ee Ëë Žž Zz Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Rr Ss Tt Uu Ff Xx Cc Čč Šš ŠČšč ʺ Yy ʹ Èè Ûû Ââ
Давайте посмотрим на ключевые моменты этой логичной системы:
Чёткая передача звуков: ж → ž, ц → c, ч → č, ш → š, щ → šč. Всё однозначно.
Решение проблемы йотированных гласных: Система элегантно решает эту "проблему", делая правописание более фонетичным.
После согласных для обозначения их мягкости и последующего гласного звука используются буквы с диакритикой: лёд → lëd, люди → lûdi.
В начале слова, после гласных и разделительных знаков йотированные гласные передаются сочетанием j + соответствующая базовая гласная: ёлка → jolka, ещё → ješčo, объём → obʺjom, семья → sem'ja.
Функция твердого и мягкого знаков: Их роль становится кристально ясной.
ъ (ʺ) и ь (ʹ) как разделительные знаки показывают, что следующая гласная — йотированная (то есть начинается со звука "й"): подъезд → podʺjezd, объём → obʺjom, мышьяк → myš'jak.
ь (ʹ) также используется для смягчения согласного на конце слова или перед другим согласным: соль → solʹ, борьба → bor'ba.
Устранение избыточности: После шипящих в окончаниях глаголов мягкий знак не нужен, так как он не несёт фонетической нагрузки: пишешь → pišeš (а не pišešʹ). Но в слове мышьяк (myš'jak) мягкий знак необходим, так как он выполняет разделительную функцию.
Пример текста на этой латинице:
Vse lûdi roždajutsâ svobodnymi i ravnymi v svojom dostoinstve i pravax. Oni nadeleny razumom i sovestʹju i dolžny postupatʹ v otnošènii drug druga v duxe bratstva.
Да, сперва непривычно. Но любая реформа правописания поначалу кажется странной. Как видите, система абсолютно логична, хоть и требует привыкания.
В заключение:
Переход на латиницу — это не предательство культуры. Турция, перейдя на латиницу, не перестала быть Турцией. Сербия и Хорватия говорят на одном языке, но используют разные алфавиты, и это не мешает их культурам развиваться.
Это смелый, но логичный шаг в будущее. Шаг к открытости, прогрессу и возвращению к тем интернациональным идеалам, которые когда-то были задушены.
А что вы думаете об этом? Готово ли общество к такому обсуждению?
